I receive questions in my email and once in a while I like to sample out few interesting ones. In last one month or so, I received two very interesting questions on which I presenting my thoughts below.
Why do you make your analysis very length and elaborate, although I like the completeness? Is it really required? Looking at EPS, P/E ratio and similar four or five parameters should be good enough to make a judgment decision.
Completeness cannot be obtained without being elaborate. Am I right? I do not now weather a length of analysis is required or not. In my view, length is not a barometer in my analysis process. I am looking for few things based on my objective, and I pursue it to understand it better. Many times I stop short knowing it is not going to be worthwhile to continue. I am looking for generating income using dividends and capital appreciation.
Recent Comments